warnings of receiving holy communion in hand

The traditional and preferred method is the reception of the Host on the tongue: Step forward and kneel at the Communion rail or station (if you stand, make a sign of reverencesuch as a bow or genuflection or Sign of the Crossbefore receiving the Host and take care not to disrupt the Communion line). The mindless behavior of this superficially trained laity brings to the sanctuary a pomposity that is both embarrassing and saddening to watch., Lay people giving out Holy Communion during Mass was rightly considered an unthinkable act of sacrilege and irreverence only 35 years ago, and for centuries preceding. We are people also, just like The term taken at face value was used because, as some astute readers will have already noticed, the document just quoted from was loosely worded. 400 years ago, Communion in the hand was introduced into Christian worship by men whose motives were rooted in defiance of Catholicism. It is a love-child of the 1960s revolution. Receive Jesus with these prayerswhen church is unavailable. speaker. Now, does this mean 5 minutes or 45 minutes unduly prolonged? Not only was Communion in the hand started in disobedience, it was perpetuated by deceit. Paul relates the communion to the sacrifice of Christ and then says to examine one's self in verse 28. It was the indignation of large numbers of the Faithful which prompted Pope Paul VI to take some action. For those not receiving Holy Communion. Basil, St. Gregory the Great, and St. Leo the Great, among others, suggesting that reception on the tongue was the standard for the early Church. A true Catholic renewal would either leave these gestures of reverence intact, or enhance them. (Acts 3:12 CSB), "When Peter entered, Cornelius met him, fell at his feet, and And where they were, they were for keeps! So, if imitation is the sincerest form of flattery, it is not unfair to ask why are our modern churchmen imitating self-proclaimed infidels who reject core sacramental teaching of Catholicism? the growth."" 8, The fact that only the priest gives Holy Communion with his consecrated hands is an Apostolic Tradition. the sea, and everything in them"" (Acts 14:11-15 CSB), "What then is Apollos? The biggest ploy used by modern clergy was to resort to flattery to approach good Catholic men and women saying, Youre a good parish member, an exemplary Christian, a good father or mother, so we want to bestow upon you the honor of being a Eucharistic minister.. Catholics believe that the real presence of our Lord is in the bread and wine and therefore it is only appropriate to behave in a such manner of reverence that is due to Him. Our fathers have told us that the Holy Eucharist is truly the Body, Blood, Soul and Divinity of Jesus Christ. The priests hands are washed over the chalice after Communion time with water and wine which is reverently consumed, to insure that the slightest Particle is not susceptible to desecration. This was obviously a liturgical abuse, which put its roots down in those countries where there were already doctrinal problems regarding the Holy Eucharist: Belgium, Holland, France, and Germany. When vast numbers of Catholics, then, rejected Humanae Vitae based on the Canadian bishops compromise, it was hardly surprising. Lycaonian language, The gods have come down to us in human form! St. Cyril of Jerusalem in 348 gave this instruction to his congregation:When you approach Holy Communion, make the left hand into a throne for the right, which will receive the King. only in their mouths." Many faithful Catholics are unaware of all of this background, as I was. Pray the Act of Contrition and the . Catholic bishops approve new guidance on Communion for pro-abortion And once a fad like Extraordinary Ministers becomes widespread, and everybodys doing it simply because everybodys doing it, then who even pays attention to existing guidelines anyway? NEW YORK (AP) Holy Communion will have a different look when in-person worship services resume at . And to add insult to injury, the introduction of Communion in the hand makes all these crucial pre-Vatican II rubrics look like superstitious sentimentalism with no foundation in reality again, contempt for what our fathers taught us and obvious contempt for the Blessed Sacrament Itself. However some may believe otherwise. But unfortunately, this is precisely what happened with the supposedly anti-Communion in the hand document of 1969. But the New Paganism has for its very essence contempt for tradition and contempt for ancestry. Spiritual Communion when you can't go to Mass Though Ecumenism will not be treated within this article (see The Problem with Modern Ecumenism, Catholic Family News March 1995 Issue), suffice it to say that this novel ecumenical spirit which Deitrich von Hildebrand called ECUMANIA became rampant during and after Vatican II. Communion on the hand may seem less reverent than communion on the tongue, especially to the more traditionally minded Catholics; it is not a sacrilege. Basil the Great considered Communion in the hand so irregular that he did not hesitate to consider it a grave fault. Their belief that the minister of Communion is no different in any fundamental from laymen. Pandemic will affect Communion rituals for U.S. Christians Shortly after Vatican II, due to the escalating abuses . crowds, to offer sacrifice. In all sixteen documents of Vatican II, there is no mention of Communion in the hand, nor was it mentioned during any of the debates during the Council. Saint of the Day for Monday, May 1st, 2023. An illustration can be given by the story of the Canadian bishops response to Humanae Vitae. Canadian of Polish descent travel to Poland with Canadian passport. If a temporary change in custom can prevent the spread of illness and even the danger of death, then it should be strongly considered as a reasonable measure. Communion on the tongue in no way detracts from the dignity of the communicant. And it can be argued that the risk is quite minimal. Statement - The antichrist has no soul and Warning about the Book of that day when I drink it new with you in my Fathers kingdom." With regard to receiving Communion in the hand, there is a significant development from the 1985 GIRM to the 2003/2011 edition. They are servants through whom A quick example will be found in the writings of Monsignor Champlin. The ecumenical spirit became the primary formative principle in the whole range of the new liturgical forms established since the Council. Communion in the hand is legitimate only where permitted, and it remains in the realm of a permission. And it must be noted that at this time, the abuse was limited to a few European countries. In an unworthy manner: Paul's dire warning about communion The practice of receiving Holy Communion in the hand first began to spread in Catholic circles during the early 1960s, primarily in Holland. We can only pray that our Church leaders will finally come to the realization that when it comes to the Blessed Sacrament, you dont reform an abuse, you annihilate it. N.S. church delivers Christmas communion to parishioners' homes - CBC First of all, it is not an act of disloyalty or disobedience to question the wisdom of the document in the first place, particularly when this permission is a revolution against all the pre-Vatican II rubrics that existed for centuries rubrics that existed for reasons of reverence, to safeguard against desecration and that were a matter of Catholic common sense. But even taking this document at face value, it is difficult to envisage circumstances that would justify the use of Extraordinary Ministers outside of mission lands. Your gift is tax-deductible as allowed by law. Since the Holy See has permitted Communion in the hand, pastors can avoid "the potential danger of hurting and undermining faith in the Real Presence" by using this moment to re-catechize the faithful on the Holy Eucharist and how to receive Jesus with proper reverence. you, I will not drink from this fruit of the vine from now on until In his best-selling book, The Last Roman Catholic?, James W. Demers said, Of those responsible for the lack of beauty in the Church, no one is more culpable than todays lay ministers. It is obvious that no priest can be lawfully forced to administer Communion in the hand, and we must pray that more priests will have the courage to safeguard the reverence due to this Sacrament, and not be trapped into a false obedience that causes them to cooperate in the degradation of Christ in the Eucharist. Then after you have with care sanctified your eyes by the touch of the holy Body, partakegiving heed lest you lose any particle of it (the bread). Therefore, it is not licit to deny Holy Communion to any of Christ's faithful solely on the grounds, for example, that the person wishes to receive the Eucharist kneeling or standing" (Redemptionis Sacramentum, no. Communion in the Hand? Pt II - The Now Word This brings us to St. Thomas Aquinas: The dispensing of Christs body belongs to the priest out of reverence towards this Sacrament, nothing touches it, but what is consecrated; hence the corporal and the chalice are consecrated, and likewise the priests hands, for touching this Sacrament. do not mention that permission was only to be a. where it had already been established by 1969. Some of the rubrics in the Old Latin Mass are as follows: These are only some of the rubrics incorporated into the Old Mass. However, in an October 6 statement, the bishops "recalled that people who, for. Throughout the centuries, the Popes, bishops and priests taught us this same thing, not so much by words, but by example and especially by the celebration of the Old Latin Mass, where profound reverence for the Blessed Sacrament as the true Body of Christ was in every move the priest made. condemned with the world." The motivation for this practice is two-fold: a) first, to avoid the dropping of Eucharistic particles [today, consecrated Hosts are regularly stolen for use in satanic Masses and other blasphemous practices even sold on eBay! But while it is true that Communion in the hand certainly happened in the early Church, it is unclear exactly when this practice started and how universal it was. They conducted the tedious Let us pray to the Lord Lord hear our prayer Prayers of the Faithful, and even greeted us over the microphone before Mass wishing us good morning, telling us what hymns well be singing and what Eucharistic Prayer Father fancies today. This is why , if the priests opposition to Communion in the hand should be fierce and firm, their opposition to Extraordinary Ministers should be even more adamant. Todays Eucharistic Ministers actually operate in defiance of, Though there is no hard proof that the loose wording of, was done on purpose, there is ample proof that the ambiguity in the Vatican II documents was deliberate. Saint Thomas, who is the prince of theologians in the Catholic Church, who towers above all the rest, whose Summa Theologica was placed on the altar next to the Scriptures during the Council of Trent, and whose teaching Saint Pius X said was the remedy for Modernism Saint Thomas clearly teaches that it belongs to the priest and only to the priest to touch and administer the Sacred Host, that only that which is consecrated (the hands of the priest) should touch the Consecrated (the Sacred Host). They figured that if they ignored Memoriale Domine and defied the liturgical law of the Church, this rebellion would not only be tolerated, but eventually legalized. The teaching that only the priests may touch the Sacred Host, that the priests hands are consecrated for this purpose, and that no precaution was too great to safeguard reverence and prevent desecration had been incorporated into the Liturgy of the Church; that is, the Old Latin Mass. (Matthew 26:26-29 CSB). The question has been asked for a long time since the Church has often allowed both methods of reception. (1 Corinthians 3:5-7). Thank you. The practice of receiving Holy Communion in the hand first began to spread in Catholic circles during the early 1960s, primarily in Holland. That is what the Christian should be most concerned about in the supper of the Lord. This is exactly what happened, and this is why we have Communion in the hand today. For the first three centuries the Eucharist was celebrated in the houses and homes of Christians. Prayers of the Faithful, and even greeted us over the microphone before Mass wishing us good morning, telling us what hymns well be singing and what Eucharistic Prayer Father fancies today. Browse other questions tagged, Like any library, Christianity Stack Exchange offers great information, but, Start here for a quick overview of the site, Detailed answers to any questions you might have, Discuss the workings and policies of this site. Lay ministers of the Blessed Sacrament would not have been possible without the revolution in rubrics that preceded it: the practice and widespread acceptance of lay-people receiving the Holy Eucharist in their palms. Apollos watered, but God gave the growth. Communion in the Hand? Pt. I - The Now Word Lay people giving out Holy Communion during Mass was rightly considered an unthinkable act of sacrilege and irreverence only 35 years ago, and for centuries preceding. It only takes a minute to sign up. And it must be noted that at this time, the abuse was limited to a few European countries. @KorvinStarmast, I find sedevacantist arrogant and self righteous. Next time I hear about this topic from one of those, whom I know, I'll have a better tid bit to offer them. Others maintain that it was never a Catholic custom, but if Communion in the hand was practiced in some limited way in the early Church, it was institutionalized and made widespread by the Arians as a sign of their disbelief in the Divinity of Jesus Christ. As a result, the Pontifical Commission officially ruled that when Ordinary Ministers (bishops, priests) are present at the Eucharist, whether celebrating or not, and are in sufficient number and are not prevented from doing so by other ministries, the Extraordinary Ministers of the Eucharist are not allowed to distribute Communion either to themselves or to the Faithful.. rev2023.5.1.43405. On January 29, 1973, an Instruction, called. Stack Exchange network consists of 181 Q&A communities including Stack Overflow, the largest, most trusted online community for developers to learn, share their knowledge, and build their careers. So what have they done? He said, We have used ambiguous phrases during the Council and we (the liberal theologians) know how we shall interpret them after., The main ambiguity which probably gave rise to todays proliferation of Extraordinary Ministers was the justification of their use if Mass would be (what was called) unduly prolonged. Second, because the priest is the appointed intermediary between God and the people, hence as it belongs to him to offer the peoples gifts to God, so it belongs to him to deliver the consecrated gifts to the people. So, whether they realized it or not, the bishops sabotaged their own pastoral letter, by giving a simultaneous red light and green light to rejection of the Papal Encyclical. Catholic Online is a Project of Your Catholic Voice Foundation, a Not-for-Profit Corporation. He polled the bishops of the world on this issue, and they voted overwhelmingly to. Guidelines for the Reception of Communion | USCCB Naturally, liberal clergy in other countries (including ours) concluded that if this rebellion could be legalized in Holland, it could be legalized anywhere. To subscribe to this RSS feed, copy and paste this URL into your RSS reader. On the other hand, there is also ample testimony from great saints like St. What's the cheapest way to buy out a sibling's share of our parents house if I have no cash and want to pay less than the appraised value? In his letter Domincae Cenae of February 24, 1980, the Pope restated the Churchs teaching that to touch the sacred species and to administer them with their own hands is a privilege of the ordained. But, for whatever reason, this 1980 document contained no threat of penalty to any layman, priest or bishop who ignored the Popes plea. This document does not grant some revolutionary indult for any and every parish to permit lay-people to administer Communion; it authorizes the use of extraordinary ministers in cases of genuine necessity , which are listed as: When there is no priest, deacon or acolyte. According to Catholicism, does Welchs Grape Juice constitute valid matter for the consecration of the Mass? If we And though these practices have been introduced under the guise of being an authentic liturgical development mandated by Vatican II, the truth is Communion in the hand is not an authentic liturgical development, was not mandated by the Second Vatican Council, and shows complete defiance and contempt for centuries of Catholic teaching and practice before us.

Mexican Non Material Culture, Articles W