celestron starsense explorer dx 102az vs 130az

Generally, refractors are less bulky and easier to operate. The 114 is a flawed bird-jones telescope with bad optics. StarSense Explorer 10" Dobsonian Telescope | Celestron Thanks. StarSense Explorer Smartphone App-Enabled Telescopes | Celestron Space is part of Future US Inc, an international media group and leading digital publisher. The only bad thing upon assembly is that I have the same problem as you did, the altitude axis on my mount is also too tight to freely the OTA up and down. Unlike Celestrons other computer-assisted offerings, the StarSense Explorer telescopes have no motors. Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment. Every slow-motion control I've ever seen attaches to the mount using visible small thumb screws. Thank you for the advice Mike and Tfer. StarSense Explorer DX 130AZ | Celestron . Celestrons main explanation is that many beginners would buy the bracket and attempt to fit it onto substandard telescopes (or simply do it improperly) and become frustrated. But they take more time to set on the mount than dx 102az usually takes. Telescope Aperture: 130mm (5.12") Focal Ratio: f/5. My alt adjust is pretty over tight as well. Read why we prefer High Point Scientific to Amazon. Youve seen the sneak peek we assume. Whereas Celestron dx 130az has an aperture of a whopping 130 mm. Some drawbacks do become evident. Your email address will not be published. Optically the telescope is well up to standard for a short-focus achromatic refractor and is well-suited to deep-sky observing. The Celestron Omni XLT 150 is available here but is priced way above my budget. For the 102 Ill need to likely buy a star diagonal, while for the 130 Ill need to buy a Cheshire or laser collimator so still a tie. The Starsense app will work with most of the telescopes that have computerised mounts. Learn more about our story and the team behind the scene. But you can certainly have better ones with that budget. The package comes with two eyepieces, giving two useful magnifications of 26x and 66x, and what is termed an erect-image diagonal. Each is different but they all feature the StarSense Explorer technology that provides a great halfway point between computerized (GOTO) telescopes and manual ones (see FAQs below if you want more information on GOTO telescopes). Winner: Between the two telescopes, Celestron Starsense Explorer dx 130az has superior image formation quality. 6mm goldline and/or a 2x Barlow would be my first picks. This is the simplest form of mounting and is particularly suitable for a beginners instrument. You can upgrade your telescope set up later with some Barlow and Plossl eyepieces. To completely overcome false color you need a considerably more expensive apochromatic refractor or a reflector. This is the best measurement of a telescopes capacity to provide good views. Conclusion: Which Celestron StarSense Explorer is best for you? StarSense dock for your smartphone. These are still decent entry level specs and will allow beginner level astronomers to see the following celestial objects provided enough of the StarSenses power is used : The tube isnt too big coming in at around 81 cm whilst the tripod will allow the device to extend to 1.24 meters, which honestly isnt that great. As for what the app provides, they have database of a few hundred celestial objects so not bad for a beginner getting involved with this hobby. This DX5 is Celestrons classic 5-inch SCT telescope tube with a hand-operable mount and the Starsense Explorer functionality that allows you to connect your smartphone and allow it to guide you, like the models above. When you unbox your new StarSense Explorer DX, you'll find: 130mm Newtonian reflector optical tube. I am sorry but I have zero knowledge on this so please excuse my raw language ! You can unsubscribe at any time. It's siblings, though, 80AZ , 102AZ, and 130AZ, are much . However, the mount does have a couple minor issues. Is LT127 a better choice? We previously complained about the lack of targets in the apps database, but Celestron has updated the app and drastically expanded its number of objects, greatly increasing its overall utility. Why you can trust Space.com If youre interested in other refractor systems, maybe due to the slightly inferior light gathering abilities of the 102AZ, this list may be helpful. The device comes with 2 1.25 kellner eyepieces at 25mm and 10mm, a StarPointe red dot finderscope, a 90 degree erect image starpointer, a Manual Alt-Azimuth mount, a StarSense Explorer phone dock, a tripod and a bunch of other miscellaneous documents. However, due to how simple and easy it is to use as result of the app, its not a bad comprise despite being less accurate. Winner: The specifications of Celestron dx 130az are more impressive. The eyepiece for the 102mm will be better positioned for the little one. The StarSense Explorer DX 130AZ is a Newtonian reflector telescope with a 5.1-inch aperture. I understand because they have the same focal length they give the same views in any given eyepiece, but using the area of a circle (pi x radius squared) 102 = 8171, and 130 = 13273. However, the system has a few notable limitations that could curtail observing sessions. How would you rate the StarSense DX6 version (6 inch SCT) compared to a Skymax 127 on GTi mount? The Celestron StarSense Explorer comes in six different models. Compare Celestron StarSense Explorer vs Celestron NexStar 130 SLT vs Celestron 130 vs Celestron DX 102AZ . New York, Same focal length. Out of the three types it is identified as having refractor-type optics. The altitude slow motion is equally stiff to turn, while the azimuth control had an annoying backlash. So, there are issues of ghosting and internal reflection. Trying to decide between these 2 scopes Im finding it difficult. One major source of problems is the mirror that is crucial to finding objects. In terms of which one is right for you, there are two key things to look at it price and size: The fact that the price difference is fairly large actually helps narrow it down as, if you know your budget, you just need to pick what matters to you most: Please let us know if you have any questions by leaving a comment below. COAST HX4 Dual-Color Utility Beam LED Clip Light. This is not to be confused with smartphone attachments that simply enable you to take photos of bright objects through the eyepiece, as found on some other beginners instruments. Overall, this is a brilliant option if you want near-perfect viewing of planets and galaxies and have the space to use it. We use cookies to personalise content and ads, to provide social media features and to analyse our traffic. A large 10" parabolic primary mirror with XLT coatings helps you make the most of StarSense technology. All of this requires some user input namely the date and time, the location, and choosing the stars. India | GlobalLogic (Assume eyepieces are upgrade on either scope of course). The downside is that it is generally in the higher budget range and that it is less portable, heavier, and bulkier. Boosting the magnification using a Celestron 2x Barlow lens revealed false color in lunar and planetary images, so this is not an ideal high-power or planetary instrument. Avoid! The mid level focal ratio is good as itll decrease the amount of chromatic aberration that can be seen, and the aperture means the max theoretical magnification of the device will be around 200x although real world usage will be around 10 20% lower. Review: Celestron StarSense Explorer DX 102AZ Jupiters cloud belts and the Great Red Spot are relatively easy to see, and you can just make out the disks of its four moons when they transit the planet. The Celestron Starsense DX 6 is exactly the same as the DX5 above but has a larger 6-inch aperture instead. The good news is you can at least upgrade your Celestron finderscope later. Four are reflector telescope types and two are refractor telescopes. As a result, youll get quite an exhilarating image. The DX 102 has a 2 rack-and-pinion focuser, but it cannot actually balance on its mount with a 2 diagonal and eyepiece, so in practice, the scope is limited to 1.25 eyepieces and accessories only. Although its portable and definitely portable it wouldnt be as easy as moving a 102az. By entering your email address you agree to receive emails from Skies &Scopes. The advantage with these models is that the Schmidt-Cassegrain design allows high aperture in a much more compact body. The software constantly checks the alignment of the instrument and complains if it cant see the sky, so snapping on the cover in between observations is not easy or ideal. (Explained!). document.getElementById( "ak_js_1" ).setAttribute( "value", ( new Date() ).getTime() ); Our team of experts has reviewed and ranked 180+ telescopes based on price and quality. If you prefer a smaller refractor, then the 102AZ below could work but will almost certainly cost more. At its core, the StarSense Explorer actually uses a relatively old technology known as plate-solving. New tabletop game 'Death in Space' lets you mine for precious gems in the ravaged Tenebris system. Uranus and Neptune are barely more than star-like dots, with blue disks barely bigger than the resolving limit of the telescope itself. Rather, the mount uses an adapter and the computing power of your smartphone to help you find your way around the sky, which well get to after covering the basics of the telescope(s) itself. Alignment procedure depends on a mirror, which collects dew, Instrument is stiff to move without slow motions. The bracket fits most phones and will work just fine even if you have a relatively thick case (or even a PopSocket). Celestron StarSense Explorer DX100AZ vs. DX 102AZ Unfortunately, the adjustment range on the device supplied did not allow it to be aligned accurately, and for the test, we used another one that we already had. Here is a quick video that shows how this works: This is a great, innovative feature that takes advantage of the smartphone that you probably already own, and gives you something simpler and cheaper than a fully computerized telescope. ), Deimos vs Europa (How Are They Different? So, it doesnt require collimation or cleaning. What you can see will improve according to the size of the aperture. The reason why this is a problem is because simply adjusting the axis to allow for a more smooth motion may take anywhere from 30 minutes to an hour to do. Optical Design: Newtonian Reflector. How about Starsense Explorer DX130 compared to Astromaster 130EQ? You Pay: $559.00. The StarSense Explorer DX-102 is limited to brighter objects by the nature of its small aperture. Why use such a time-consuming means of attachment? However, there are some key differences between them. Which is stark opposite to Celestron dx 130az. Patented, award-winning StarSense sky recognition technology uses your smartphone to analyze star patterns overhead and calculate the telescope's position in real-time. COAST HX4 Dual-Color Utility Beam LED Clip Light. There are six different models to suit different budgets and priorities. A pair of flexible slow-motion cables are included for making fine adjustments, though the backlash from them can be annoying when using high magnifications, and its not as intuitive as a simple Dobsonian mount, for instance. I realized that it was very important for me that it the telescope be kid friendly. Testing out the StarSense Explorer DX 130AZ at our HQ in a brightly lit industrial section of light-polluted Torrance, CA. Celestron dx 102az has an aperture of 102 mm as the name says. Also note, that the same telescope is also being sold as the Popular Science StarSense Explorer DX 5. Finally, there is a standard red-dot finder to help in pointing the telescope at objects. Our Verdict: The Celestron StarSense Explorer DX 102 AZ telescope is a beginner's ultimate telescope. The other telescope offered on the same DX mount is a $400 130mm f/5 Newtonian reflector. Celestron StarSense Explorer DX 102 AZ Review (Refractor) The optical quality is good for a telescope of this type, but for planetary observing a different instrument would be preferable, such as the 130 mm reflector in the same range. DXC Technology Employee Reviews in Bengaluru, Karnataka - Indeed View planets, brighter nebulae, galaxies, and star clusters from the city PLUS fainter, deep sky objects from darker sites. Includes Free. This means we may make a commission if you purchase an item using one of our links*. 4mm Eyepiece vs 20mm Eyepiece! It has a focal ratio of f/6.5, which means that it has a comparatively short tube for its diameter a situation that provides a wide field of view and bright image with a fairly compact instrument. These views will be much brighter and clearer with the larger aperture models. With the tripod attached the length would be 1.24 metres too. Its also not flexible to eyepieces other than the 1.25 ones. Its StarSense technology links a smartphone to a telescope in a simple, yet robust fashion. Compare Celestron StarSense Explorer vs Celestron NexStar 130 SLT vs This free guidetells youwhat gear you need to get started photographing the Milky Way, Planets, or Deep Sky Objects. However, it has the lowest aperture, which will limit your viewing capacity. This is fortunate, as the Quick Start manual ends at this point. These eyepieces have a lot of plastic in their build, but use glass optics and are fairly sharp, with more eye relief than a typical Plossl ocular (particularly beneficial with the 10mm). A star diagonal is standard with astronomical refractors and reflects the beam from the focuser through 90 degrees to allow a much easier observing position than crouching on the ground looking up through the tube, but usually, it has the drawback of reversing the image as in an ordinary mirror. Thats all from us about Celestron Starsense explorer dx 102az vs 130az. Overall, if you have the budget then it makes sense to get the higher aperture DX6 over the DX5 as it will provide better views. 10.7 Arcsec-(Rayleigh)0.89 Arcsec-(Dawes), 1.37 Arcsec-(Rayleigh)1.14 Arcsec-(Dawes), Has more magnification power and forms better views, Less expensive but doesnt provide enough features considering the price. All these instruments are standard members of the Celestron range and are available in other mounting packages. You can find the Celestron dx 130az on Amazon which costs around $450. Mars dark spots can be seen, although barely, when the planet is close to Earth, while its polar ice caps are a little more obvious. Celestron StarSense Explorer DX 130AZ Review (Is The, Orion EON 115ED Triplet Review (Photography Device Worth, Celestron Omni XLT 120 Review (Is It Worth The Price?! Celestron has been attempting to use various methods of technological assistance for the past two decades first with the NexStar series of telescopes and SkyAlign (to mixed results), then with their StarSense technology (a flop), their AstroFi and NexStar Evolution telescopes, and now the StarSense Explorer. Get the 130. It has an aperture of 114 mm (4.5 inches). Celestron dx 102az weighs around 6.4 kg. Celestron - StarSense Explorer DX 102AZ Smartphone App-Enabled Telescope - Works with StarSense App to Help You Find Stars, Planets & More - 102mm Refractor - iPhone/Android Compatible 4.3 out of 5 stars 274 But youll find the images quite sharp. I'll be observing from my front/backyard, which is in a location with a Bortle scale of 4 (rural/suburban transition). Its also portable and has a better optical design. As for other key specifications, dx 102az has a focal ratio of 6.5. -cam, Zane great review as always thanks. Celestron StarSense Explorer LT 114AZ Review: Don't Fall Into The Trap. With all models, if the conditions are right you should be able to view the planets of the solar system and deep-sky objects like other galaxies. For example, if Saturn or the Andromeda galaxy are above you that night, you can select them on the app and then follow the arrows on the app to point the telescope at them. Required fields are marked *. This forum and community is a wonderful resource! Its a simple, aluminum-legged alt-azimuth mount with slow-motion controls on both axes. SKU: CEL-22461. They wont find things automatically for you, but they will search for what you can see and guide you to look at whatever planet or object you want to look at. Which eyepieces would you suggest to replace those less-than-ideal ones that come with the Stars Sense 130? The 80 mm model is the smallest with the weakest viewing capacity, and the 254 mm model is the largest with the best. The only shortcoming I guess you could say is its average specs and its Starsense technology being somewhat hit or miss however, from the research Ive done on it, the 102AZ is a device worth checking even if its a little more expensive than an equally powerful reflector system. But its only limited to brighter objects in the night sky. The StarSense has an Aperture of 102mm, a focal length of 650mm resulting in a focal ratio of just under f/6.5. I recently purchased the 130mm version for a great price. Heres how it works. It is the most portable (being the lightest) and is generally the cheapest. Need more information regarding both telescopes? Overall, this is the most entry-level of the four telescopes in this range. The model I tested is the Explorer DX 102AZ refractor telescope ($400). Between Celestron Starsense dx 102az and 130az, Celestron dx 130az is better. Unlike household mirrors, its reflective coating is on the front surface rather than the back, so regularly wiping it clear could result in damage to the coating. Darth Vader Force FX Elite Lightsaber review, Obi-Wan Kenobi Force FX Elite Lightsaber review, Creality Ender 3 S1 Pro review: Best-in-class print quality, PlayStation VR 2 review: Stress-free virtual reality, BlissLights Sky Lite Evolve Galaxy Star Projector review, Ruko F11GIM2 review: powerful beginner drone, poor image quality, Creality Sonic Pad review: A turbo boost for your FDM printer, Rocket Lab to launch 2 missions for NASA hurricane-watching constellation, SpaceX Starship launch under FAA investigation after raining potentially hazardous debris on homes and beaches, NASA updates schedule for astronaut flights to space station through 2024, Sisko and Worf unite to stop a crazed Klingon emperor in IDW's 'Star Trek: Day of Blood' event, Your monthly guide to stargazing & space science, Subscribe for just 1 per issue with our Spring Savings, Issues delivered straight to your door or device. There are four instruments in the Celestron StarSense Explorer range: an 80 mm refractor, a 114 mm reflector, the 102 mm refractor under test, and a 130 mm reflector. ), Deimos vs Uranus (How Are They Different? Nevertheless, the purpose for this software is to provide convenience for beginner level astronomers so, Ill explain how it works here. The Celestron StarSense Explorer DX 130AZ telescope is all about the smartphone app used to align it, though it's a more manual affair than you might expect. They are generally more expensive though. (14) notify when in stock. Celestron StarSense Explorer DX 102AZ 102mm f/6.5 AZ 22460 B&H The final step is to remove the cap from the mirror on the StarSense dock again, courageously pulling off with some effort and fitting your smartphone into the spring-loaded slider. Way better scope but not comparable mount wise. The initial advent of computerized star catalogs, which were loaded into telescope handsets, made it possible to align a telescope on the sky by pointing it at just three bright stars. How does the StarSense Explorer 102 compare with the CELESTRON ASTRO FI 102 MM WI-FI MAKSUTOV CASSEGRAIN? There are eight different Celestron StarSense Explorer telescopes which we cover in more detail below. Im still figuring out, between Starsense Explorer DX130 and LT127. So all that is left is light gathering. Stargazing Help is a participant in Amazon Associates program. Im very interested in the cosmos but being a chemistry student, I dont have much time to learn the precise location of Messier objects, how to find planets, and looking at the moon over and over gets boring (when you dont know what youre doing) comparing this to a Dob 8 in my opinion is like comparing a truck to sports car. Any additional thoughts you have to sesparate the two? Now, launch the Starsense app on your phone. All the telescopes from Celestron Edge HD and Schmidt-Cassegrain are compatible with the Starsense app. Its not as good at viewing faint objects in outer space unlike a reflector or a compound device. Mostly Astromaster and Powerseekers. We dont have this model in my country but I saw a Celestron Starsense Explorer LT 127AZ being sold brand new. Great review! Which is better than the image youll see from normal reflector optics. However, I want to share a great tip with you. Future US, Inc. Full 7th Floor, 130 West 42nd Street, This mount is a little on the small side for either optical tube, but it works just fine. Here lately though, it has not been able to track location.

Aircraft Annual Inspection Flat Rates, Tenacia Dante Bowe Wedding, Richie Sambora New Jersey Guitar Rig, Ray White Greensborough, Monarca Who Killed Fausto, Articles C